A selection of recent media reports

Fence to deter immigrants
Work will start next month on a six-mile fence topped with razor wire on Greece's border with Turkey to deter illegal im...
The Independent (07-Feb-2012)
Britain must become a land of opportunity once more to attract the world's workers
COUNTRIES receive the immigrants they deserve. A migrant has 192 countries to
City A.M. (07-Feb-2012)
Bin Laden's former right-hand man in Europe released on bail
Radical cleric Abu Qatada to be confined to his home for 22 hours a day as he fights deportation
The Independent (07-Feb-2012)
Qatada back on the streets within days
Abu Qatada, the radical Islamic preacher once described as Osama bin Laden's \u201Cright hand man in Europe\u201D, will ...
Telegraph.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
Abu Qatada release: Home Office fury as judge frees 'Bin Laden aide'
Radical Islamist cleric will walk free from Long Lartin maximum security prison afte
Guardian.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
Why has Abu Qatada not stood trial in the UK?
Lawyers say the government was determined to pursue deportation, which was thought to be the easy option
Guardian.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
Greece to build £2.5million six-mile razor wire wall to block worst illegal immigration route into Europe
The busiest crossing point for illegal immigrant
Mail Online (06-Feb-2012)
Radical cleric Qatada granted bail
A radical Muslim cleric accused of posing a grave threat to Britain's national security will be released on bail within ...
London Evening Standard (06-Feb-2012)
Greece starts building border fence with Turkey
\u2014 filed under: Greece, immigration (ATHENS) - Greece on Monday started building a fence on its border with Turkey
EUbusiness.com (06-Feb-2012)
Latvian man wanted for gunpoint rape deported after being found living in Gainsborough
A Latvian man wanted for raping a teenager at gunpoint in his home countr
This is Lincolnshire (06-Feb-2012)
Abu Qatada in court seeking bail
London hearing to decide whether radical cleric should be freed after extradition to Jordan was blocked by Europe court
Guardian.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
FURY AS WAR CRIMES SUSPECT IS ALLOWED TO STAY IN BRITAIN
CAMPAIGNERS have condemned a legal ruling that a war crimes suspect should stay in Britain because he has
Express.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
England 'border controls' fear
Published on 6 February 2012
Herald Scotland (06-Feb-2012)
How Britain's migrants sewed the fabric of the nation
History shows it's hard to pick out which migrants will be good for the UK. It is risky for the state to try
Guardian.co.uk (05-Feb-2012)
French interior minister claims some civilisations 'superior'
France's conservative interior minister in charge of immigration policy has spark
Telegraph.co.uk (05-Feb-2012)
BOMB PLOTTERS ARE MY STUDENTS, ADMITS CHOUDARY
HARDLINE Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary taught six of the nine fanatics jailed last week for plotting to bomb Londo
Daily Star (05-Feb-2012)
Man accused of involvment in war crimes wins human rights claim
A man accused of being complicit in war crimes in the former Yugoslavia has been allowed to stay in Brit
Telegraph.co.uk (05-Feb-2012)
Twisted concept of honour shames any civilised society
Forget cultural sensitivities, there are no excuses for domestic terrorism, writes Ruth Dudley Edwards You probably saw...
Independent.ie (05-Feb-2012)
TIME FOR SOFT-TOUCH BRITAIN TO GET TOUGH ON IMMIGRATION
BRITAIN has a proud and honourable history when it comes to immigration.
Scottish Daily Express (05-Feb-2012)

Policy, Amnesty & Voting 11.4

Asylum Amnesty; the decks are far from cleared

Summary

1.On October 24, 2003 the Home Secretary announced that 15,000 families who had sought asylum before October 2000, and most of whom had had their application rejected, would be granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK. The families selected were ones who had a child at the time of making their application. The Home Secretary described this amnesty as a "one-off exercise". This is extremely implausible. Another batch is already in the pipeline.

2. This is now the third asylum amnesty in Britain and the Government's continuing failure to return failed asylum seekers makes it highly likely that a similar exercise will be required in the future. We estimate that in the period 2001-2003 a further 19,000 families have had, or will have, their asylum applications rejected and will fail to leave the UK. Most of these 19,000 families - our estimate is 14,000 of them - will have had a dependent child at the time they made their application. So, there is likely to be a future need for a similar size exercise to that just announced unless the Home Secretary takes special action to remove these families.

Details

3. In 2001 and 2002 there were 155,000 applications for asylum in the UK (excluding dependants). In 2003 there are likely to be a further 45,000 applications (again excluding dependants) bringing the total for the 3 year period to 200,000.

4. An analysis of decisions in the period 1997-2002 shows that just under 37% of applicants will be accepted for asylum or be granted leave to remain in the UK. A further 13% will depart from the UK, leaving 50% of applicants who will fail to be granted asylum or leave to remain and who will stay in the UK illegally. This equates to 100,000 principal applicants for the period 2001-3.

5. Of these principal applicants, we estimate that about 19% (19,000 people) will have families and around 14% (14,000 people) will have a dependent child .

6. The Government has granted an amnesty to 15,000 principal applicants who have families and who had a dependent child when they arrived in the UK. The amnesty will apply to those who sought asylum in the UK before October 2000...

7. So, although the Home Secretary has described this as a "one-off exercise" it seems highly likely that there will be a need for a similar exercise, involving a similar number of people, in the future.

8. The only way that this can be avoided is if the government finds a way of successfully removing asylum seekers, including asylum seeker families. There is no indication of this happening - indeed if they were able to do this there would have been no need for the current amnesty.

28 October, 2003

Notes

  1. 2003 estimate based on Q1 and Q2 actual figures and numbers continuing at Q2 levels in Q3 and Q4.
  2. A family is defined as a principal applicant with one or more dependants. The proportion with dependants has been calculated by reference to table 8.3 of the Asylum Statistics United Kingdom 2002 which analyses those seeking support through the National Asylum Support Service (NASS) by numbers of dependants.
  3. Assumes 50% of families with 1 dependant and 100% of all families with two or more dependants have a dependant child.